Video Blog 2: deploying renewables needs political will

In the second of my video blogs with RTCC I argue that we are not deploying renewables fast enough because of a lack of political will. We must think about renewables as being a package of technologies, not individual technologies.

 

Posted in Energy Security, Video blog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The first of my video blogs: why the UK should not pursue nuclear

See below my first video blog, made in conjunction with RTCC. In two and a half minutes, I argue why the UK should not pursue nuclear as a policy option- the cost, nuclear proliferation, and waste are all prohibitive.

 

Posted in Nuclear, Video blog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Summary of Twitter Q&A with Mark Kenber, CEO The Climate Group

Mark Kenber and I took part in the first of a series of live Twitter Q&As run by The Climate Group. It was good to see so much interest and engagement.

If you missed the discussion yesterday morning, then you can see parts of the conversation by following this link.

Posted in Energy Security | Tagged | Leave a comment

UK Energy Policy Will Fail If Government Persists With Nuclear Fantasies

Tony Juniper, Jonathon Porritt and Charles Secrett and I wrote a letter to the Prime Minister on 12th March warning him that his plans for another generation of nuclear reactors are ill-conceived and doomed to failure.

To substantiate the broad arguments advanced in letter and accompanying note to the Prime Minister, we have produced a series of six supplementary Briefings. The final Briefing was released today and coincides with a Press Conference in London. Further, we have produced 10 Killer Facts on Nuclear. All of the Briefings, and the Press Release can be found below.

Why Nuclear Power makes No Sense for the UK:

A series of Briefings from Tom Burke, Tony Juniper, Jonathon Porritt and Charles Secrett
1) Subsidising the Nuclear Industry (25 March)
2) Investing in Nuclear: Current Concerns (4 April 2012)
3) The New Nuclear Industry (17 April)
4) The Wider Economic Impacts of Nuclear Power (20 April)
5) Why Nuclear Power is Not the Answer for Climate Change or Energy Security (27 April)
6) Nuclear Power: A Toxic Issue for the Coalition Government (2nd May)

Press Release:

Today, four of the UK’s most experienced environmentalists will argue that the UK’s energy policy is not only completely untenable, but puts the Coalition Government in an extremely fragile position.

Tom Burke, Tony Juniper, Jonathon Porritt and Charles Secrett wrote a letter to the Prime Minister on 13th March warning him the UK’s energy policy was already at risk – in particular because of an ill-judged fixation with bringing forward a new nuclear programme.

In the intervening weeks, those original words of warning have already been borne out by the decision on the part of RWE npower and E.ON UK to withdraw from the official bidding process to build ten new nuclear reactors in the UK. What’s left of the nuclear industry in the UK is in meltdown, including EDF, whose entire rationale is at risk following the success of Francoise Hollande in the first round of the French Presidential election.

At today’s press conference, the four former Directors of Friends of the Earth will issue a new call to the Prime Minister, as expressed by Tom Burke:

“It is most unfortunate that the Prime Minister has not found time to reply to our letter to him back in March. The truth is that much of what we warned about then has already started to become apparent – the Prime Minister has a duty to seize hold of this issue without further delay. Otherwise, the entire energy strategy for the UK will be put at risk.”

The last in a series of six supplementary Briefings, reinforcing the economic arguments against nuclear power will also be released today. This final Briefing, (‘Nuclear Power: A Toxic Issue for the Coalition Government’) highlights the risk to the Coalition Government in persisting with a strategy that cannot possibly deliver the outcomes that the Coalition Government is hoping to achieve.

Commenting on the fragility of the Coalition’s position, Jonathon Porritt said:

“The Lib Dems have already paid a very heavy price for their participation in the Coalition Government – including the complete reversal of their former opposition to nuclear power. As and when this nuclear power fantasy collapses – as it assuredly will – with it will go all the Government’s objectives on renewables, energy efficiency and the whole low-carbon economy. The Lib Dems will bear the brunt of the blame for this policy fiasco, inflicting further damage on its rapidly diminishing electoral prospects.”

The economic arguments – in terms of investor perspectives and wider economic considerations – are summarised in the fact sheet, Nuclear Power: 10 Killer Facts.

Charles Secrett said:

“Put prejudice aside and look at the evidence. Nuclear power cannot meet the UK’s energy needs, while other options can. Building 10 new nuclear stations will be a very dangerous waste of public money and time, and cause household and business energy bills to soar. Energy saving, renewable power and co-generation are the most efficient and cost-effective ways to generate clean electricity, while creating large numbers of jobs in all parts of the country.”

Tony Juniper said:

“Far from doing away with fossil fuels, the UK’s doomed nuclear ambitions could actually make things worse. By putting political weight behind nuclear power stations that won’t actually get built, attention is being taken away from renewable energy and energy efficiency. By the time the policy does fail, we won’t have renewable energy on the scale we could have done and as a result we will be forced to rely on fossil power sources. The message is simple: back nuclear and get gas”.
[Ends]

For more information please contact: Anne Paintin, 01242 266 777, a.paintin@forumforthefuture.org

Twitter: Use #UKenergysecurity in your tweets to get involved in the discussion

Posted in Nuclear | Tagged | Leave a comment

Nuclear policy: part of the Government’s omnishambles

The collapse of the Government’s nuclear policy is a somewhat overlooked part of its current omnishambles. In part this is because very few of the journalists writing about nuclear power know much about the subject. Most continue to assert that all but one of Britain’s current nuclear power stations will be shut in this decade even though it is three months since EDF announced that it was seeking life extension for its existing fleet.

This means that some of our current AGRs may still be working in 2030. After all, if you were EDF why wouldn’t you want to take advantage of the massive windfall created by the carbon support price for an extra ten years? Much cheaper and less risky than building new reactors.

Meanwhile the Government from the Prime Minister down is talking to anyone who will listen about buying Horizon, the nuclear consortium which EoN and RWE have just withdrawn from. Even if you thought that it was a good idea to hand over control of your energy policy to Russian gangsters or the Chinese government, the really big problem with nuclear remains unsolved.

Horizon is a joint venture set up by the two German utilities. It has no assets. In order to borrow the £30 billion or so that would be needed to pay for the reactors someone with very deep pockets is going to have to guarantee the loans. It won’t be the British Government.

Whoever it might be would be taking a big bet that a company with no track record in building nuclear power stations would be able to do so on time and to budget – something Areva with all its experience has so far found impossible. They would also be taking a very big bet that the Treasury will be willing to allow a 30 year lock-in to nuclear electricity costs that are on a par with off-shore wind.

For information on the press conference I will be holding on nuclear power, on Wednesday 3 May, follow this link.

Posted in Blog, Nuclear | Tagged | Leave a comment

Prospects for a Clean Revolution

This blog introduces the topic of a #CleanRevolution that I will be covering in a live Twitter Q&A at 10 o’clock tomorrow morning with Mark Kenber, CEO of The Climate Group.

It is not yet widely understood by politicians, policy makers and the public alike that climate change will lead to a complete transformation of the human prospect. This is true whether climate policy succeeds or fails.

If it succeeds the transformation will take place over the next thirty years. If it fails, the transformation that is already underway will accelerate gradually and become dramatic in the thirty years after that.

The choice is whether events or people drive that transformation.

If people make the choice, then over the next thirty years the way energy is used will be transformed.

This will bring with it a wide range of co-benefits in terms both of economic efficiency and human well being. Food and water security will be maintained.

However, the pattern of economic winners and losers will also be disrupted.

If events drive the transformation then the global average temperature will rise inexorably and for all practical purposes, irreversibly.

Food and water security will be undermined and ever larger numbers of people will be displaced, exposed to conflict and disease and subject to deeper climate induced poverty.

One of the features of climate change is that we have an unusually clear analysis of the problem.

We know exactly what we need to do – to construct a carbon neutral global energy system by the middle of the century.

We know how to do it – all the technologies and engineering knowledge we need to get there in time are already available.

We know we can afford to do it – the International Energy Agency estimates that the net cost of doing so might add only a couple of trillion dollars to what we will be investing in energy anyway over the next twenty five years.

That is a few tens of billions of dollars a year – I used to think that was a lot of money until the bankers taught me otherwise.

What we do not know is how to put the technology and capital together. Doing that will require political will and political will is exactly what the economic crisis has revealed to be lacking.

Posted in Blog, Energy Security | Tagged | Leave a comment

Speech: Mining, cities and sustainable development

I spoke to the China Executive Leadership Academy in Pudong, Shanghai, on 20 April 2012. Download the pdf here.

The core message of the lecture is that mines and cities have more in common than you think. In particular, you cannot move them. This means they both need national governments to maintain the social, economic and political stability necessary for them to thrive. In the face of the nexus of risks to food, water, energy and climate security they can no longer simply assume that this will happen. Therefore city leaders and mine owners both need to get much more engaged with national governments to ensure that timely and effective responses are delivered.

Posted in Speeches | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Why Nuclear Power makes No Sense for the UK – fifth briefing

The fifth in a series of Briefings, written by Tony Juniper, Jonathon Porritt and Charles Secrett and me, is released today. These are being released following our letter of 12th March to the Prime Minister warning him that his plans for another generation of nuclear reactors are ill-conceived and doomed to failure.

Briefing five, Why Nuclear Power is Not the Answer to the problems of Climate Change and Energy Security, is released today and a pdf can be downloaded here. It focuses on:

Climate change
1. The opportunity cost of nuclear 
2. The technical debate: can nuclear and renewables co-exist? 
3. Is nuclear power really low-carbon

Energy Security
4. Peak Uranium? 
5. Nuclear is not ‘ever-ready’ 
6. Nuclear’s ‘nightmare scenario’ in the UK

Why Nuclear Power makes No Sense for the UK – A series of briefings for the government

Already released:
1) Subsidising the Nuclear Industry (25 March – view here)
2) Investing in Nuclear: Current Concerns (4 April 2012 – view here)
3) The New Nuclear Industry (17 April – view here)
4) The Wider Economic Impacts of Nuclear Power (20 April – view here)
5) Why Nuclear Power is Not the Answer for Climate Change or Energy Security (27 April – view here)

Still to come:
6) Nuclear Power: A Toxic Issue Goes Critical for the Coalition Government (2nd May)

For more information or interviews please contact Sam Allen: 07775612215, samanthamayallen@hotmail.com

To mark the release of the final briefing on 2nd May, Tom Burke, Tony Juniper, Jonathon Porritt and Charles Secrett will be holding a press conference in London.

Press Invite – Nuclear Power: A Toxic Issue Goes Critical for the Coalition Government - Wednesday, 2 May 2012

Mary Sumner House, 24 Tufton Street, Westminster, SW1P 3RB get directions

11.00 am Arrival and refreshments
11.30 am Briefing, Q & A and open discussion
12.30 pm Close

The final briefing (to be published on May 2nd) highlights the risk to the Coalition Government itself: for how much longer will the Liberal Democrats continue to support a strategy that undermines every aspects of its pre-Election energy policy?

To reserve your place, please email Sam Allen, samanthamayallen@hotmail.com

Posted in Nuclear | Tagged | Leave a comment

Why Nuclear Power makes No Sense for the UK – fourth briefing

The fourth in a series of Briefings, written by Tony Juniper, Jonathon Porritt and Charles Secrett and me, is released today. These are being released following our letter of 12th March to the Prime Minister warning him that his plans for another generation of nuclear reactors are ill-conceived and doomed to failure.

The fourth Briefing, The Wider Economic Impacts of Nuclear Power, can be downloaded here, and focusses on:

- Costs
- The European Single Market
- Carbon Leakage
- Impact on the UK Jobs Market
- Job Generation

Already released are:
1) Subsidising the Nuclear Industry- accessed here.
2) Investing in Nuclear: Current Concens- accessed here.
3) The New Nuclear Industry- accessed here

Still to come are:
5) Why Nuclear Power is Not the Answer to Climate Change or Energy Security
6) Nuclear Power: A Toxic Issue for the Coalition Government

To mark the release of the final briefing on 2nd May, the four of us will be holding a press conference in London.

For more information or interviews please contact Sam Allen:
Sam Allen, 07775612215, samanthamayallen@hotmail.com

Posted in Nuclear | Tagged | Leave a comment

Why Nuclear Power makes No Sense for the UK – third briefing

The third in a series of Briefings, written by Tony Juniper, Jonathon Porritt and Charles Secrett and me, is released today. They are released following our letter of 12th March to the Prime Minister warning him that his plans for another generation of nuclear reactors are ill-conceived and doomed to failure.

This third Briefing, The New Nuclear Industry, can be downloaded by following this link.

The first Briefing, Subsidising the Nuclear Industry, was released on 26th March, and can be accessed here, and the second Briefing, Investing in Nuclear: Current Concerns, can be accessed here.

Still to come are:
4) Nuclear Power: Wider Economic Considerations
5) Why Nuclear Power is Not the Answer to Climate Change or Energy Security
6) Nuclear Power: A Toxic Issue for the Coalition Government

To mark the release of the final briefing on 2nd May, the four of us will be holding a press conference in London.

For more information or interviews please contact Sam Allen:
Sam Allen, 07775612215, samanthamayallen@hotmail.com

Posted in Nuclear | Tagged | Leave a comment