House of Commons Energy Bill debate – Monday 3rd June 2013


At the House of Commons debate on the Energy Bill on Monday 3rd June Lib Dem Martin Horwood expressed his view that the UK Nuclear industry is not very competitive, it is dominated overwhelmingly by one nationalised supplier EDF, and there is a risk of organising a massive transfer of funds from British bill payers to a French nationalised industry.

The scale of the nuclear subsidy has been underlined by former Friends of the Earth director Tom Burke who said that “At a strike price of £100 per megawatt hour and a 30 year contract life this would require a subsidy of 1 billion pounds per year above today’s wholesale price for electricity, this would lead to a transfer of 30 billion pounds to Électricité de France (EDF) from Britain’s householders and businesses. Should the whole of the 16 gigawatts of new nuclear anticipated by the energy minister be financed on similar terms it would cost householders and business 150 billion pounds by 2050.”

This is an enormous commitment, and one that we really need to scrutinise and make sure that there is value for money being inserted into this process.

(segment begins 1:39:42)


About tomburke

Tom Burke is the Chairman of E3G, Third Generation Environmentalism, and an Environmental Policy Adviser (part time) to Rio Tinto plc. He is a Visiting Professor at both Imperial and University Colleges, London. He is a member of the External Review Committee of Shell and the Sustainable Sourcing Advisory Board of Unilever and a Trustee of the Black-E Community Arts Project, Liverpool.
This entry was posted in Domestic, Economics, Energy, Energy Security, Nuclear, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.